Not After Midnight and Other Stories

Product Information

Not giving too much away, he goes on to relate how he had gone to Crete to paint for a week. The hotel was quiet and not badly appointed, although to the unease of the staff, he insists on moving to a chalet that later transpires to have been previously occupied by a man who had drowned in the sea nearby only two weeks before. Grey is unperturbed by this and carries on with his painting. In fact, the only disruption to his peace and quiet is the presence of a loud and abusive American called Stoll and his silent wife. The man drinks like a fish, and, according to the hotel bar-man, he’s even making his own hooch in their chalet: Timothy Grey, a preparatory school headmaster, takes a holiday to the Greek island of Crete with the intent of finding some solitude in which to paint. On arrival at his hotel, he asks to move his accommodation to a better chalet, near the water's edge, which the hotel management agrees to with some reluctance. The reason becomes clear when he discovers that the chalet's previous occupant had drowned while swimming at night. Also staying at the hotel is Stoll, a drunken and obnoxious American, and his silent and apparently deaf wife. They spend every day out in a small boat, ostensibly fishing. suppose he, or she, is going to change her wig?''Don't say anything,' Laura murmured. 'I'll follow her and find out. She may

I would like to thank my wonderful guests, Joy Fokkema and Mitch Krayton, for putting up with my shenanigans and being on the show. We had a conversation that was both entertaining and meaningful. Well, you have a lot of company, Many people find the ending cryptic, confusing, obscure. Its intended by the author to be that way. The underlying theme of 'distorted vision' which runs throughout the tale, is used by DuMaurier to disrupt normal, straightforward, linear, A-B-C storytelling. Thus, we feel a little bit of the same queasy disorientation which the characters in the story do; when they realize that 'what they see' is not trustworthy. The author is reminding us how much we are slaves to our strongest sense: vision, often at the cost of every other faculty. The film adaptation of ”Don’t Look Now” is regarded by some as one of the best pieces of British cinema. It has long been a favourite of mine and I am delighted to say I enjoyed the short story it is based upon very much, incredibly well-written. It grips you from beginning to end, slowly building that sense of foreboding. It was the opening tale in this collection of four short stories. In the dark, among the bushes and trees, two people overhear things about themselves that force them to re-evaluate their lives. The next day, several of the party experience mishaps and personal humiliations, and by the end of the excursion all apart from Robin have met the fate that they most dread. In dealing with the disasters the whole group learn a great deal about themselves and their loved ones, and they return happier people.

A man sent to assist with a computer learns that science experiences in secluded locations never end well. The Way of the Cross (1971) A pilgrimage to the Holy City changes all the characters but how much is influenced by the surrounding or by the unexpected self introspection.

We are then subject to a really awkward scene. Hank grabs the mixtape alluded to earlier and puts it in the karaoke machine. He dedicates the next song to Abby and the girl he made the mixtape for. He then sings the entirety of Lisa Loeb’s Stay (I Missed You). Anyone who grew up in the 90s will remember this song. It was, literally, everywhere and a massive sleeper hit. Now, all of a sudden, it is appearing in horror movies. It’s like a meme that I somehow missed. Frankly speaking, my first encounter was with Nicholas Roeg’s film starring Donald Sutherland and a wonderful Julie Christie, rather than with Daphne du Maurier’s short story itself, and I have consequently always asked myself why the title is “Don’t Look Now”. Of course, that was not the only question I was left with after watching Roeg’s fascinating screen adaptation of du Maurier’s story because Roeg is a lot more ambiguous, opaque and equivocal in his approach to the original and he overwhelms his spectators with powerful symbolism into the bargain. How will these two mesh during the show? What will they find out they have in common? What about their differences? You're in the right place to find out. Short Fiction: Come Wind, Come Weather, 1940; Happy Christmas, 1940; The Apple Tree, 1952; Kiss Me Again, Stranger, 1952; Early Stories, 1955; The Breaking Point, 1959; The Treasury of du Maurier Short Stories, 1959; Not After Midnight, 1971; Echoes from the Macabre, 1976; The Rendezvous and Other Stories, 1980; Classics from the Macabre, 1987.Daphne du Maurier is one of my favorite authors and she has never disappointed me thus far. These five longish short stories, each with a different focus but all surprising and unpredictable or at least to me. I would like to thank my wonderful guests, Dawn Witte and Dr. Christine Sauer, for putting up with my shenanigans and being on the show. We had a conversation that was both entertaining and meaningful. Our narrator, Timothy Grey (a fitting name), may refute the charge of self-complacency, but we needn’t believe him, and what is more (or less, depending how you see it), he is most definitely a dull, conceited man. Nevertheless, when he chances to get involved with a mysterious American couple, his eventless life gets into motion and he discovers a darker side within himself, which he tries to ascribe to a hideous Grecian artefact that allegedly exerts a baleful influence on him. Of course, of course, it’s usually the artefact, isn’t it? – The story will probably baffle you for it denies you a clear explanation of the things that happen, but then you should not forget it is told by a first-person narrator. (****) How will these two mesh during the show? What will they find out they have in common? What about their differences? Find out on Here.

How will these three mesh during the show? What will they find out they have in common? What about their differences? Find out here. Du Maurier's biographer Margaret Forster considered "Not After Midnight" to be a 'not very successful story', demonstrating how the author's liking for intricate plot could lead her into complications which made her writing tortuous. [9] She thought however that "The Way of the Cross" worked well, and noted that at one stage du Maurier considered turning it into a novel but was worried that she would not be able to maintain the tension. [9] "The Breakthrough" she found to be skilfully worked, with an atmosphere of chilling menace which du Maurier herself had greatly liked. [6] Adaptations [ edit ]Daphne du Maurier's occasional volumes of short stories have always shown how compellingly she can make our flesh creep (think of the brilliant 'The Birds', and that truly horrifying story 'Kiss Me Again, Stranger'). This new collection, which contains five long stories, makes exactly the same stunning, sinister impact. Not After Midnight-the title gives warning that here are no cosy tales for reading to a maiden aunt or an elderly cousin. The Way of the Cross" (3 stars)-It started off interesting but then just meandered. Reading about a group of travelers to Jerusalem was not that interesting in the end. I kept thinking something bad was going to befall them and it just felt a bit too like a comedy of errors in the end. Also may be I am too bloodthirsty? I was like, eh no one died. A solitary teacher goes to Crete and looks forward to spending his holiday alone, painting. He is determined to stay in a sea-front chalet and when he comes across No.62, with its perfect view, he is adamant that he will stay there, even when he finds out the previous occupant drowned just two weeks before his arrival. He is further dismayed when an obnoxious American staying in the same resort takes a shine to him and invites him to visit his own chalet, but 'not after midnight'. I’ve never read anything by Du Maurier – and to be honest, I doubt I ever would have done, had I not stumbled upon/been given a couple of old editions of her work. Seemed a shame to throw them out, I thought, or to keep them if I detested her work, so I decided to give her a chance, starting with this collection of her short stories. I’m glad I did.